Picasso "stole" his inspiration from African artists.
Click here to read.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Jabodetabek Residence Connexion (JRC) DAMRI: SDC - MRT Lebak Bulus
Perum DAMRI menyediakan layanan transportasi bagi warga Gading Serpong dan Bumi Serpong Damai yang membutuhkan akses ke Stasiun MRT Lebak Bu...
-
What the medias and his team mates say about Zidane: Andrew McKenzie (The BBC): The flawed genius David Trezequet (French team, and William ...
-
“Yuk Nabung Saham”, slogan yang saat ini sedang gencar dipublikasikan oleh pihak Bursa Efek untuk mengajak masyarakat “menabung” di inst...
4 comments:
I thought inspiration was something that personal for the artist himself, thus cannot be owned by the "inspirator".
I think they refer to some of Picasso's works which are "similar" to some sculptures (but we don't know how similar it is), therefore it is actually not original.
copycat is a natural things I guess.
Soalnya kadang2 kita gak tahu apakah karya kita udah pernah ada atwa bakal ditiru orang nantinya...jadi yah sah-sah ajah, asalkan nirunya jgn keterlaluan amat dan mengatasnamakan uang.
info terbaru, Dan Brown with is "Davinci Code" katanya hasil nyontek juga tuh proses research-nta...nah loh???
Betul katanya ide ceritnya enggak original. Malah menariknyasi penerbit kedua buku ini sama lho. Jadi sangat sulit mendebat tuduhan ini.
Post a Comment